RF Generation.  The Classic and Modern Gaming Databases.RF Generation.  The Classic and Modern Gaming Databases.

New on the Blogs
Hot Community Blog Entries
Nielsen's Favorites on Channel 4
RF Generation Message Board Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2024, 11:21:28 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Member Map Arcade Login Register
News: RF Generation: You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.

RF Generation Message Board | Other | Media Room (Moderator: wildbil52) | What are you watching right now? 0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 222 223 [224] 225 226 ... 298 Print
Author Topic: What are you watching right now?  (Read 1215791 times)
techwizard
Donor
*****
Canada
Posts: 3839


 Stats
« Reply #3345 on: December 19, 2012, 02:26:05 PM »

There totally isn't. In the case of this movie they could have cut out an hour of superfluous junk. There's pointless action scenes, extended just...walking/running/flying scenes that go on way too long. Also, they added all this lore that wasn't in the book in order to tie this story to LoTR that I'm certain no one would miss. They also added this stupid villain character that eats up time and is completely unnecessary. If they had left that hour out and made it an hour longer it could easily be one movie.

It has its moments, but it's more disappointing than good.

Exactly as I predicted/expected, then. What a shame, Jackson should've known better. Even when it was still going to be a two-parter I had my reservations. But I thought that if they made it into two fairly short (120min max) movies they could get away with it. The same thing happed with Harry Potter 7. It just about works, but the first movie ends nowhere and some scenes just aren't as relevant as I was used to from the other 6 Harry Potter movies. It's so clear HP7 should've been a single 180min movie. The best HP movie (not book!) imo is HP4 (Goblet of Fire).

But making The Hobbit into three 3-hour movies is absurd. Anyone who's ever read the book can tell you they either have to make all scenes unnecessarily long, add irrelevant stuff (LoTR appedices), or do both. Doing the former ruins the pace of the movie, doing the latter ruins the cohesion of the actual story.

I own the Extended Edition box sets of the LoTR trilogy and even those border on absurdity (especially Return of the King) because they're just too long. Trying to do the same when the source material is 1/10th as big is a recipe for disaster.

I'm willing to bet PJ will end up regretting doing an obvious cash cow/fan service trilogy instead of a single 3-hour movie, which would've been just about perfect for The Hobbit. I wouldn't be surprised to see an "abridged" Director's Cut for the 10-year anniversary of the trilogy that cuts all the fluff and restores the pace of the book.

LotR appendixes aren't irrelevant at all, i don't see why fans of the books wouldn't be happy with getting more canon from the books put into film. i would understand if it were all creative licensing, but even though it wasn't in the hobbit book itself, a lot of the extra stuff was definitely happening at the time of the Quest of Erebor. the only places where things were really unneccessary was most of the story with Azog and his orc raids on the dwarves...that was just wrong. and a few things with radagast. but otherwise it was all good, and i hope to see extended editions that add more when the blu-rays come out.
Logged
techwizard
Donor
*****
Canada
Posts: 3839


 Stats
« Reply #3346 on: December 24, 2012, 08:12:57 PM »



LOL
Logged
Razor Knuckles
& Knuckles
Donor
*****
United States
Posts: 3546


 Stats
« Reply #3347 on: December 24, 2012, 08:18:58 PM »

Logged
Sirgin
DB Reviewer
****
Belgium
Posts: 8081
Awards: 2016 & 2018 Fantasy Football Winner



WWW Stats
« Reply #3348 on: December 25, 2012, 10:40:18 PM »

Sabrina - (1954) - B-

--> Not all that remarkable movie with Humphrey Bogart and Audrey Hepburn. Some gaffs here and there.

The Shop Around the Corner - (1940) - B

--> Another old movie. This is more of a typical feel-good love story.

The weirdest thing about watching these old movies is looking up their wikipedia pages and seeing they've been dead for decades. A human life doesn't seem to last that long. Humphrey Bogart died in 1957!

Modern Times - (1936) - A

--> A classic, unlike the two above, imo. Some genuinely funny scenes, even today.

O Brother, Where Art Thou? - (2000) - B+

--> Great movie but it doesn't really go anywhere. I know that's the point, but still. The singing was the best part. That and the sirens.
Logged
Zagnorch
MAJIN SONIC'S BLOODLUST MUST BE SATED!
Donor
*****
United States
Posts: 10973


 Stats
« Reply #3349 on: December 26, 2012, 06:15:06 AM »

Caught A Christmas Story yesterday, naturally.

It's only the greatest Christmas movie ever.
Logged
GrayGhost81
Blog Writer
***
United States
Posts: 3928


 Stats
« Reply #3350 on: December 26, 2012, 11:12:57 AM »

Saw Rare Exports on Christmas eve. The one about demon Santa. Better than I thought but there was something hugely disappointing about the ending.
Logged

two_scoop_steve
Sega Genesis
****
United States
Posts: 1836


 Stats
« Reply #3351 on: December 26, 2012, 11:32:30 PM »

Indie Game the Movie
Logged

GrayGhost81
Blog Writer
***
United States
Posts: 3928


 Stats
« Reply #3352 on: December 27, 2012, 11:31:17 AM »

Indie Game the Movie

I loved it, what did you think?
Logged

Sirgin
DB Reviewer
****
Belgium
Posts: 8081
Awards: 2016 & 2018 Fantasy Football Winner



WWW Stats
« Reply #3353 on: December 28, 2012, 10:19:09 PM »

Limelight - (1952) - A

--> Great Charlie Chaplin film, quite serious, too. The whole movie is obviously about Chaplin himself, which is interesting.

The Red Violin - (1999) - B+

--> Fun movie, not what I was expecting but good all the same.

The 39 Steps - (1935) - B

--> A Hitchcock movie. You can see how old this movie is in certain scenes where the lighting is really sub-par. Or maybe it was the film used at the time?

Michael Clayton - (2007) - A

--> Already seen this one before. Great movie.
Logged
Sauza12
DB Contributor
***
Posts: 2969
Awards: 06 RFG Baseball Winner



 Stats

Champion of
 
« Reply #3354 on: December 30, 2012, 08:43:06 PM »

I just watched the first season and a half of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles with my daughter.  Now I'm watching the extras on the "Manos":  The Hands of Fate MST3K DVD while I do some work from home.
Logged
The Metamorphosing Leon
Laying on the green leaf, left and abandoned...
Donor
*****
United States
Posts: 9496


WWW Stats
« Reply #3355 on: December 31, 2012, 01:20:34 AM »

Breaking Bad again
Logged

When shall his new form be revealed?
Sirgin
DB Reviewer
****
Belgium
Posts: 8081
Awards: 2016 & 2018 Fantasy Football Winner



WWW Stats
« Reply #3356 on: December 31, 2012, 01:27:00 PM »

Notorious - (1946) - F

--> Even though I complained about the lighting in The 39 Steps, this movie is 100 times worse. Atleast The 39 Steps was engaging. The plot in this one isn't big enough, the scenes are super slow. Everything about it annoyed me. Can't see what Hitchcock was thinking with this one. It starts confusing and ends abruptly. I think he had other things on his mind. Cary Grant and Ingrid Berghman are supposed to be big-time stars of the time but I found their acting dull.

Little Women - (1994) - A

--> Good movie. Typical historical drama, but not too sugar-coated. Funny to see Christian Bale before he was Batman.

Blade Runner - (1982) - B

--> I didn't think it was that special. It must've been at the time, considering all the effects and the style of the movie. I can understand how it was a benchmark, visually. The plot is paper-thin, which annoyed me. These bad guys need to be taken care of. Go. That's it. Why? No clue. I prefer Ghost in the Shell if I were to watch a cyberpunk movie.
The problem with creating near-future sci-fi movies is that you can watch them...in the near future. Some things in this movie seem really advanced, obviously, the androids. Other things are hilariously primitive. I couldn't stop laughing at the scene where Ford inspects a photo on a 8 inch CRT monitor. All the voice commands were stupid. If that's what monitors will be like in 2019, I'd rather have today's tablets with HD touchscreens. Grin Oh and I was annoyed at the fact that it was night the entire movie. And raining.
Logged
hXd
Algebraic!
SNES
****
United States
Posts: 2087


 Stats
« Reply #3357 on: January 05, 2013, 08:44:07 PM »

Introduced my friend to Battle Royale that other night and she liked it! The next movie we're gonna do is 2LDK.
Logged

pull_the_plug
N-Gage
*
United States
Posts: 15


 Stats
« Reply #3358 on: January 05, 2013, 10:47:57 PM »

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Logged

hXd
Algebraic!
SNES
****
United States
Posts: 2087


 Stats
« Reply #3359 on: January 09, 2013, 11:42:39 AM »

Watched Limitless last night, it was surprisingly good!
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 222 223 [224] 225 226 ... 298 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

RF Generation Theme derived from YabbGrey By Nesianstyles | Buttons by A.M.A
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.16 seconds with 24 queries.
Site content Copyright © rfgeneration.com unless otherwise noted. Oh, and keep it on channel three.