I played SneaK King for around 5 hours or so and did ~50 of 80 challenges. It get's a bit repetative but the challenge is laid back and rather fun, and his "flourishes" (point multipliers) are hilarious. Also a bit of enviromental interaction/puzzles thrown in there with a bit of strategy believe it or not. Best game of the three IMO.
Definately worth the price and I'm very surprised as my expectations were very low on these games, a very nice little subset of games for any 360 owner. Haven't tried multiplayer yet but I'm sure that's worth a laugh as well.
i agree with Tan. sneak king is the better of the 3. if your going to buy just one buy this one.
big bumpin' - this is one i could have done without. i find it lacking in 'fun'. i would have been better if the playing area was larger. last man standing in the open ice rink left nothing to avoid and made it almost pointless when you receive damage when you bump someone (atleast thats how it seemed). honestly i found this game confusing. i doubt i will be playing it again. 10/100.
pocketbike racer - a 5 out of 10. i would have given it a better rating if the tracks were larger. it took me 23 seconds to round the parking lot. come on, even on other racing games the timer goes over a minute at least. short courses equals repetativeness equals boredom. 65/100 chance i will play this again.
sneak king - love it. this is obviousely where all the production time went. they must have started here and lost the creativeness in the beginning of pocketbike racer and crapped out on big bumpin'. the point of sneak king is to sneak up on or hide and suprise people with warm burger king food. that may sound boring (my first thought) but i actually found it fun. well worth the $4. 90/100 i will playthis again. im actually going to try to beat it.
Author
