RF Generation Message Board

Announcements and Feedback => Announcements and Feedback => Topic started by: Mr. Ksoft on September 01, 2008, 07:33:31 PM



Title: Bug relating to searching for people who are selling games you want
Post by: Mr. Ksoft on September 01, 2008, 07:33:31 PM
OK so I just went through and put up almost my entire massive wishlist of stuff (around 600 items) and for kicks I decided to run the search to see if anyone had stuff for sale.  It mostly works, but in this case "mostly" isn't enough...

While about 1/3 the games listed with sellers will show up correctly, the other 2/3 show up like: "2 Members found who is selling" with no game name after it... and then right below that it doesn't show the game listing, but it does show who owns a copy and how many they have--  but still no indication of what game that might be.  So most of it is completely useless because you don't know what game it's talking about.

Is this a known bug with the system or have I broken it by feeding it so many games?


Title: Re: Bug relating to searching for people who are selling games you want
Post by: St0rmTK421 on September 01, 2008, 09:00:13 PM
There was a limit on the maximum number of trade matches found.  I raised it, let me know if it works.


Title: Re: Bug relating to searching for people who are selling games you want
Post by: Mr. Ksoft on September 01, 2008, 09:27:51 PM
I can see them now, but I have noticed that occasionally it will show certain ones twice, even though I've only got them on the wishlist once.  I think it may be related to things with the same title but different platform...  like I just ran it and it showed Tetris for NES twice (the closest I have to that is that I have the NES and GB versions both on the list) and Sonic CD twice (I have both the USA and Japanese versions on the list but it identified them both as the Sega CD version as opposed to one being SCD and one being Mega CD)


Title: Re: Bug relating to searching for people who are selling games you want
Post by: St0rmTK421 on September 01, 2008, 10:53:39 PM
Yup, there was a pretty simple error that was never caught until now.  It should be fixed.