|
Title: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: GrayGhost81 on November 14, 2012, 07:55:34 AM Hard to tell with these kinds of things, but if I got one of these I would keep it :)
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/disc-mix-mars-lego-lord-rings-release-235139383.html#more-14560 Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Addicted on November 14, 2012, 08:28:58 AM Gamefly is supposed to ship this game this week. It should be interesting to see which version it is. Thanks for the news.
Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Fleach on November 14, 2012, 10:08:43 AM According to Game Informer the disc does contain the full game, but was accidentally labelled "Demo Disc."
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/11/13/lego-the-lord-of-the-rings-recalled.aspx Looks like this will be a collectable variant. I'd keep it too if I got one of these. Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Shadow Kisuragi on November 14, 2012, 10:11:31 AM Quick, someone pick up a copy and get the images into the database! :P
Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Izret101 on November 14, 2012, 10:14:32 AM According to Game Informer the disc does contain the full game, but was accidentally labelled "Demo Disc." Article in the first post said the same thing. Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Shadow Kisuragi on November 14, 2012, 10:17:26 AM According to Game Informer the disc does contain the full game, but was accidentally labelled "Demo Disc." Article in the first post said the same thing. HI IZRET Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Izret101 on November 14, 2012, 10:54:21 AM Yea i guess i can be grumpy in the morning.
GET OFF MY LAWN DAMN KIDS Anyways back to the misprint that is getting a recall for no good reason other than to be a waste of money. Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Addicted on November 14, 2012, 01:04:17 PM There is also the BLOPS 2 Mass Effect 2 edition:
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/14/mass-effect-accidentally-included-with-black-ops-2 Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: GrayGhost81 on November 14, 2012, 02:36:40 PM Quick, someone please come up with a clever comment about how much better off those people are with ME2 than CODBLOPSTOO. I'm drawing a blank here!
Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Izret101 on November 14, 2012, 10:15:36 PM There is also the BLOPS 2 Mass Effect 2 edition: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/14/mass-effect-accidentally-included-with-black-ops-2 Video was priceless. Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: GrayGhost81 on November 15, 2012, 06:43:25 AM There is also the BLOPS 2 Mass Effect 2 edition: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/14/mass-effect-accidentally-included-with-black-ops-2 Video was priceless. derp DOUBLE GULP derp derp Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Addicted on November 19, 2012, 07:56:39 AM There is a bug in the PC version of BLOPS 2 that cuases the game ot crash almost immediately after it is loaded. To bypass this you have to set your time zone to +8 or China. This causes the game to load properly. Not exactly a misprint but still...
Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: techwizard on November 20, 2012, 01:57:06 AM that must only happen on some hardware setups, because i've put in about 2 hours on the campaign with no problems, and a friend has beaten it already without crashing.
Title: Re: Lego LOTR potentially collectable misprint. Post by: Addicted on November 20, 2012, 08:18:14 AM that must only happen on some hardware setups, because i've put in about 2 hours on the campaign with no problems, and a friend has beaten it already without crashing. You are correct. I should have specified that in my previous post. Of the people I know that purchased BLOPS 2 for PC 3 out of 4 had to change the time zone. Based upon that and some Google searching it seemed to be a larger enough issue to make a port about. |